Data not submitted.

www.cz-warez · 2009-01-09 5:10 am

You may begin using it to submit spammers at: http://www.stopforumspam.com/add SAMY Data not submitted

pedigree · 2009-01-09 10:42 am

And how about some more information that might help us figure out whats wrong?

Use this Anecdote - you go to the doctors and he asks whats wrong and you reply "I dont feel well"

www.cz-warez · 2009-01-09 7:22 pm

pedigree wrote:

And how about some more information that might help us figure out whats wrong?
Use this Anecdote - you go to the doctors and he asks whats wrong and you reply "I dont feel well"

SPAMBOT registrační data:

IP adresa: 94.178.119.225
Uživatelské jméno: Zubkit
E-mailová adresa: kirik2767@mail.ru

ICQ číslo: 316415661
AIM Address:
MSN Messenger:
Yahoo Messenger:
Websajt: http://m p 3.3b b.r u /
Umístění: USA
Zaměstnání: Enforcement, security
Zájmy: Fotball
Podpis:

pedigree · 2009-01-10 12:07 am

added jsut fine for me.

do you have an api key?

www.cz-warez · 2009-01-10 4:16 am

pedigree wrote:

added jsut fine for me.
do you have an api key?

http://www.stopforumspam.com/forum/spammers

pedigree · 2009-01-10 12:38 pm

that shows me my submissions

www.cz-warez · 2009-01-10 3:25 pm

pedigree wrote:

that shows me my submissions

Where the API kej I give forum

1/9/09 11:13 PM 91.203.164.69 Ленок - JS stonshini@gmail.com

Last edited by www.cz-warez (2009-01-10 3:28 pm)

hhopper · 2009-01-10 10:16 pm

"What we have here is a failure to communicate."

Hop

jokeroo essex · 2009-01-11 4:46 am

www.cz-warez wrote:

pedigree wrote:
that shows me my submissions
Where the API kej I give forum
1/9/09 11:13 PM 91.203.164.69 Ленок - JS stonshini@gmail.com

No good.
Get an API key from here
http://www.stopforumspam.com/signup

www.cz-warez · 2009-01-11 10:07 pm

kej API should be to verify whether it concerns certain forums and not to allow anyone to block

pedigree · 2009-01-13 11:45 am

Ill try this in an easy phrase

You need an API key to submit spammers

No API Key = No submit spammers

MacHeadCase · 2009-01-13 3:53 pm

www.cz-warez wrote:

kej API should be to verify whether it concerns certain forums and not to allow anyone to block

This looks kinda weird to me. Why should we not be able to block spammers? Maybe I am misunderstanding the post though.

Last edited by MacHeadCase (2009-01-13 3:56 pm)

zaphod · 2009-01-13 5:25 pm

Okay MacHeadCase... I deleted my former post for fear of causing a flamewar...
but...

I support your position. Alarm bells went off regarding poisoning of the database when it seemed he wanted to prevent banning of certian URLs.

As far as I know, this is a negative aspect only database, and greenlighting is against the logic of it.

Thanks for letting me know I am not the only suspicious bastard around here.

And I checked out his username .com ... seems odd a Czech forum would be a .com, but whoomp there it is. Can't read a lick of it, but maybe diabolic.bg could sniff it out (assuming it's in a lang he can read.)

So yes... something smells rotten in Denmarcz.

Zap (In good company I see!)

AsciiD · 2009-01-13 8:40 pm

As I understand, .com .org .edu .net are valid anywhere in the world.

If I were in Australia (for example), I might register a domain in Bermuda, then have it served in Taiwan with Hindi language content. All without sinister motive.

In this case I could then legitimatly have registered the domin as .com .org .edu .net .au .bm (and possibly .tw)

National identifiers may be, but are not necessarily required, depending on the local regulatory body.

Anyone have a better informed understanding?

Last edited by AsciiD (2009-01-13 8:42 pm)

MysteryFCM · 2009-01-13 11:15 pm

In short, ANY TLD can be used by anyone, anywhere - they aren't country specific.

zaphod · 2009-01-14 7:13 am

Forget I ever said:

Zaphod wrote:

seems odd a Czech forum would be a .com, but whoomp there it is.

The rest still applies.

Be nice to know if they are up to no good. Things are Badenov allready.

BTW... I think a .us can be dis-appropriated if found to be in use by a non-USA entity... I could be wrong, but I think it's about the only TLD that is that way. In otherwords, I am well aware of the ethereal nature of TLDs.

Zap

www.cz-warez · 2009-01-14 8:36 am

problem is resolved

AsciiD · 2009-01-14 9:02 am

www.cz-warez wrote:

kej API should be to verify whether it concerns certain forums and not to allow anyone to block

It appears to me he is merely trying to confirm that with an API key he (representing a forum) will be allowed to add spammers; and that without one, just any user (forum) will be unable to blacklist (block) spammers on this site.

Last edited by AsciiD (2009-01-14 10:36 am)

zaphod · 2009-01-14 10:42 am

Yep, parsing error due to broken english and my paranoid mind.

Please forgive.

Zap

AsciiD · 2009-01-14 10:58 am

True paranoia requires meticulous care, and attention to detail.
It must be nurtured with doubt and suspicion in the small hours of the day.

MacHeadCase · 2009-01-14 12:02 pm

hhopper wrote:

"What we have here is a failure to communicate."
Hop

Well Hop said it the best.

Last edited by MacHeadCase (2009-01-14 12:03 pm)

hhopper · 2009-01-15 3:08 am

Actually, Strother Martin said that in the movie 'Cool Hand Luke!'

Hop

rhyfedd · 2009-01-20 5:24 am

I have an API key etc, but thought I'd add this here.

I've been submitting spam for a few days (I mean "legally", here, not spamming people) but am having more and more trouble getting it to accept the data. It's taken me ages today to get 3 or 4 through and it just won't accept my current one at all.

Have other people also had this problem?

This is a bit different but ...

I've found for the last couple of days that if I put all 4 components of an IP in it comes up saying 0 results - but if I take the last two parts out, it comes up with results - and they include entries identical to my starting point.

Sorry if this is covered somewhere else - I was just trying a quick visit.

pedigree · 2009-01-20 10:08 am

Do you have an example of the data you searched for at it failed on returning so that I can investigate please?

rhyfedd · 2009-01-20 8:41 pm

I kept a list of 9.

Today 5 of them return results on the full number.

These didn't

84.19.180.179
62.141.50.38
71.60.51.212
89.178.59.203

Thanks.

#1 2009-01-09 5:10 am

Data not submitted.

#2 2009-01-09 10:42 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#3 2009-01-09 7:22 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#4 2009-01-10 12:07 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#5 2009-01-10 4:16 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#6 2009-01-10 12:38 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#7 2009-01-10 3:25 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#8 2009-01-10 10:16 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#9 2009-01-11 4:46 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#10 2009-01-11 10:07 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#11 2009-01-13 11:45 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#12 2009-01-13 3:53 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#13 2009-01-13 5:25 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#14 2009-01-13 8:40 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#15 2009-01-13 11:15 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#16 2009-01-14 7:13 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#17 2009-01-14 8:36 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#18 2009-01-14 9:02 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#19 2009-01-14 10:42 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#20 2009-01-14 10:58 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#21 2009-01-14 12:02 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

#22 2009-01-15 3:08 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#23 2009-01-20 5:24 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#24 2009-01-20 10:08 am

Re: Data not submitted.

#25 2009-01-20 8:41 pm

Re: Data not submitted.

Board footer